Namespaces Page Discussion. Please enable your ad blockers, disable high-heat drying, and remove your device from Airplane Mode and set it to Boat Mode. Navigation Main page Latest comic Community portal xkcd. A webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language. Bottom panel is larger than top four, and aligned to right. Archive What If?
Oh well: Standard creepiness rule: P some digits are replaced with X for privacy reasons -- DiEvAl talk For security reasons, please leave caps lock on while browsing. Views Read Edit View history. Am I the only one who thought of this? Actually, not quite.
As age increases, the age range of potential non-creepy partners widens.
Talk:314: Dating Pools
The full analysis is of course much more complicated, but I can't stay to talk about it because I have a date. For security reasons, please leave caps lock on while browsing. Actually, not quite. For security reasons, please leave caps lock on while browsing. Am I the only one who thought of this? An year-old's range iswhereas a year-old's might be more like
XKCD standard creepiness rule
The chart appears to be using the following function for the maximum age: Views Read Edit View history. Comics I enjoy: Namespaces Page Discussion. By showing that there are whole swathes of people who she couldn't marry in the first place without being in a creepy relationship, and that as her age increases, the range of non-creepy partners increases, combined with Census Bureau data, Cueball shows that her eligible dating pool is in fact still increasing. Don't ask you how you found it? The pools of singles is shrinking.